Home > News
- > August 2010
- > July 2010
- > June 2010
- > March 2010
- > February 2010
- > January 2010
- > December 2009
- > November 2009
- > October 2009
- > September 2009
- > August 2009
- > July 2009
- > April 2009
- > March 2009
- > February 2009
- > January 2009
- > December 2008
- > November 2008
- > October 2008
- > September 2008
- > August 2008
- > July 2008
- > June 2008
- > May 2008
- > April 2008
- > March 2008
- > February 2008
- > January 2008
'Phone call overtime' story takes a faulty line
Recent reports in sections of the media that police officers are paid hundreds of pounds for answering work-related telephone calls while off duty are sensational and also completely untrue.
Overtime is paid if the call requires an officer to take action in his or her off-duty time.
But the simple act of talking to a manager or a colleague - to learn, for example, that their duty hours have been changed - will earn them precisely nothing and nor would they expect it to.
Officer will often receive and make workârelated calls on their mobile phones, which they are expected to pay for themselves.
The reports also fail to mention the thousands of hours a year which officers work for no pay out of goodwill, whether it is turning up before their shift to complete paperwork or doing youth work to help divert young people from crime.
The quality of policing in London would drop markedly if this goodwill was ever withdrawn, although, fortunately, there is no danger of that ever happening.
The Metropolitan Police Federation has argued for many years that there should be sufficient officers on-duty 24/7 to obviate the need for those who are off duty to be disturbed.
This was, indeed, how things were 30-odd years ago. The present system was introduced to save money.
Officers do not work overtime because they choose to but because they are ordered to in order to serve the public.

